What's holding back AI's productivity boost?  |

It’s not the model—it’s your system. GAINS™ reveals why
Browse Chapters
Share
Twitter
Linkedin
Mail
Copy Link
https://www.faros.ai/blog/github-copilot-vs-amazon-q-enterprise-bakeoff
Share
Twitter
Linkedin
Mail
Copy Link
Copy link to blog post entry
Copied!
https://www.faros.ai/blog/github-copilot-vs-amazon-q-enterprise-bakeoff
September 23, 2025

GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q: The Only Real Enterprise Bakeoff Results

Based on real telemetry from 430+ engineers at a leading data protection company

When a data protection and cyber resilience company needed to prove the ROI of AI coding assistants before approving enterprise licenses, they didn't rely on vendor claims or marketing materials. Instead, they conducted something almost unheard of in the industry: a rigorous, data-driven bakeoff between GitHub Copilot and Amazon Q Developer (formerly CodeWhisperer).

The results? GitHub Copilot delivered 2x higher adoption, 2x better acceptance rates, and 12% higher developer satisfaction—ultimately saving developers an extra 3 hours per week compared to Amazon Q.

Here's what happened when 430 engineers put both tools to the test in real enterprise conditions.

The Challenge: Proving AI Assistant ROI Before Enterprise Rollout

Unlike many organizations that adopt AI coding assistants based on enthusiasm or vendor promises, this data protection company took a methodical approach. With 430 engineers and enterprise security requirements, they needed concrete evidence that AI coding assistants would deliver measurable business value.

"We required a data-driven evaluation of Copilot vs. CodeWhisperer," explained the engineering leadership team. "Our security and compliance requirements meant we couldn't afford to make the wrong choice."

Working with a strategic consulting firm and using a combination of experience sampling and SDLC telemetry, they designed a controlled pilot program that would provide the definitive answer: Which AI coding assistant actually delivers better results for enterprise development teams?

The Methodology: Real Enterprise Conditions, Not Lab Tests

The bakeoff was not conducted in an isolated lab environment with artificial tasks.

Instead, it used:

  • Real enterprise codebase: Complex, brownfield projects with existing technical debt
  • Actual development workflows: Code review processes, testing pipelines, and deployment dependencies
  • Enterprise security constraints: Data protection requirements and compliance considerations
  • Mixed experience levels: Engineers from junior to senior, across different technology stacks
  • Production-ready tasks: Features, bug fixes, and maintenance work that directly impacted customer deliverables

Faros AI, their software engineering intelligence platform, ingested telemetry from both pilot groups and presented results through pre-built dashboards that tracked adoption, usage, satisfaction, and downstream productivity impacts.

The Results: GitHub Copilot's Clear Enterprise Advantage

Adoption and Usage Metrics

The first indicator of tool effectiveness came from actual usage patterns:

GitHub Copilot Group:

  • Adoption Rate: 78% of developers actively used the tool
  • Daily Usage: Average 4.2 hours of active assistance per developer
  • Feature Utilization: High engagement with code completion, chat, and inline suggestions

Amazon Q Group:

  • Adoption Rate: 39% of developers actively used the tool
  • Daily Usage: Average 2.1 hours of active assistance per developer
  • Feature Utilization: Limited primarily to basic code completion

Verdict: GitHub Copilot achieved 2x higher adoption with developers naturally gravitating toward more consistent usage.

GitHub Copilot Amazon Q
Adoption Rate 78% of developers actively used the tool 39% of developers actively used the tool
Daily Usage Average 4.2 hours of active assistance per developer Average 2.1 hours of active assistance per developer
Feature Utilization High engagement with code completion, chat, and inline suggestions Limited primarily to basic code completion
Adoption and usage comparison of GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q

Acceptance and Integration Rates

Beyond adoption, the quality of AI suggestions determined real productivity impact:

GitHub Copilot:

  • Acceptance Rate: 22% of suggestions accepted and kept in final code
  • Code Integration: 89% of accepted code remained unchanged through code review
  • Context Accuracy: Strong performance with complex business logic and existing patterns

Amazon Q:

  • Acceptance Rate: 11% of suggestions accepted
  • Code Integration: 67% of accepted code required modification during review
  • Context Accuracy: Better suited for greenfield projects with simpler requirements

Verdict: GitHub Copilot delivered 2x better acceptance rates with higher-quality suggestions that required fewer revisions.

GitHub Copilot Amazon Q
Acceptance Rate 22% of suggestions accepted and kept in final code 11% of suggestions accepted
Context Accuracy Strong performance with complex business logic and existing patterns Better suited for greenfield projects with simpler requirements
Acceptance rate and comparison of GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q

Developer Satisfaction and Experience

Developer feedback revealed significant differences in user experience:

GitHub Copilot Feedback:

  • Overall Satisfaction: 76% satisfied or very satisfied
  • Workflow Integration: "Feels like a natural extension of my IDE"
  • Learning Curve: "Productive within the first week"
  • Most Valued Features: Context-aware suggestions, chat integration, code explanation

Amazon Q Feedback:

  • Overall Satisfaction: 64% satisfied or very satisfied
  • Workflow Integration: "Useful but feels disconnected from my actual work"
  • Learning Curve: "Takes time to understand when it's helpful"
  • Most Valued Features: Basic completion, AWS service integration

Verdict: GitHub Copilot achieved 12% higher developer satisfaction with better workflow integration and user experience.

GitHub Copilot Amazon Q
Overall Satisfaction 76% satisfied or very satisfied 64% satisfied or very satisfied
Workflow Integration "Feels like a natural extension of my IDE" "Useful but feels disconnected from my actual work"
Learning Curve "Productive within the first week" "Takes time to understand when it's helpful"
Most Valued Features Context-aware suggestions, chat integration, code explanation Basic completion, AWS service integration
Developer satisfaction and experience comparison of GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q

Productivity and Time Savings

The ultimate test: Measurable impact on development velocity and engineer productivity.

GitHub Copilot Results:

  • Time Savings: 10 hours per developer per week
  • Fastest Improvements: Code writing (40% faster) and code reviews (25% faster)
  • Secondary Benefits: Reduced compilation time, faster debugging

Amazon Q Results:

  • Time Savings: 7 hours per developer per week
  • Fastest Improvements: Boilerplate generation, AWS configuration
  • Secondary Benefits: Better AWS service integration, infrastructure code

Verdict: GitHub Copilot delivered 42% more time savings (3 additional hours per developer per week).

GitHub Copilot Amazon Q
Time Savings 10 hours per dev/week 7hours per dev/week
Fastest Improvements Code writing (40% faster) and code reviews (25% faster) Boilerplate generation, AWS configuration
Secondary Benefits Faster debugging Better AWS service integration, infrastructure code
Productivity and time savings comparison of GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q
AI Is Everywhere. Impact Isn’t.
75% of engineers use AI tools—yet most organizations see no measurable performance gains.

Read the report to uncover what’s holding teams back—and how to fix it fast.

Why GitHub Copilot Won: The Enterprise Factors

Superior Context Understanding

Enterprise codebases are complex, with layers of business logic, custom frameworks, and organizational patterns that AI tools must understand to be effective. GitHub Copilot's training and architecture proved better suited for this complexity.

"GitHub Copilot understood our existing code patterns," noted one senior engineer. "Amazon Q felt like it was built for greenfield AWS projects, not our mature codebase."

Better IDE Integration

Developer productivity tools succeed when they integrate seamlessly into existing workflows. GitHub Copilot's deep integration with VS Code and other popular IDEs created a more natural development experience.

Stronger Code Review Performance

In enterprise environments, all code goes through review processes. GitHub Copilot's suggestions required fewer modifications during review, reducing the downstream burden on senior engineers and maintaining code quality standards.

Learning and Adaptation

Throughout the pilot period, GitHub Copilot showed better adaptation to the team's coding patterns and preferences, while Amazon Q's suggestions remained more generic.

The Business Impact: What Enterprise Leaders Need to Know

ROI Calculation

With 430 engineers and an average salary of $140K, the productivity gains translated to significant business value:

GitHub Copilot Impact:

  • Weekly Time Savings: 4,300 hours (430 engineers × 10 hours)
  • Annual Value: $11.2M in productivity gains
  • Tool Cost: $380K annually (430 licenses × $19/month × 12 months)
  • Net ROI: 2,840% return on investment

Amazon Q Impact:

  • Weekly Time Savings: 3,010 hours (430 engineers × 7 hours)
  • Annual Value: $7.8M in productivity gains
  • Tool Cost: $258K annually (430 licenses × $19/month × 12 months)
  • Net ROI: 2,930% return on investment

While both tools delivered strong ROI, GitHub Copilot's additional 3 hours per developer per week generated an extra $3.4M in annual value.

GitHub Copilot Amazon Q
Weekly Time Savings 4,300 hours (430 engineers × 10 hours) 3,010 hours (430 engineers × 7 hours)
Annual Value $11.2M in productivity gains $7.8M in productivity gains
Tool Cost $380K annually (430 licenses × $19/month × 12 months) $258K annually (430 licenses × $19/month × 12 months)
Net ROI 2,840% return on investment 2,930% return on investment
ROI Calculation for GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q

Implementation Considerations

The bakeoff revealed critical factors for successful AI coding assistant adoption:

Change Management: GitHub Copilot's higher adoption rate reduced change management overhead and training requirements.

Code Quality: Fewer revisions needed for GitHub Copilot suggestions reduced senior engineer review burden.

Developer Retention: Higher satisfaction scores indicated better long-term adoption and reduced tool churn.

Security Integration: Both tools met enterprise security requirements, but GitHub Copilot's suggestions aligned better with existing security patterns.

Lessons for Engineering Leaders

Pilot Before You Scale This company's methodical approach prevented a costly enterprise-wide mistake. Rather than selecting based on vendor presentations, they gathered real data from real usage.
Measure what matters Beyond basic metrics like "lines of code generated," they tracked adoption rates, code quality, and developer satisfaction—leading indicators of long-term success.
Consider enterprise context AI tools that work well for individual developers or small teams may not scale to enterprise complexity, security requirements, and existing workflows.
Factor in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) While licensing costs were similar, the differences in adoption rates, training requirements, and code review overhead significantly impacted total ROI.

The Larger Migration Decision

The bakeoff results influenced a broader technology decision. Based on GitHub Copilot's superior performance, the company initiated a larger migration to the GitHub ecosystem, consolidating their development toolchain around a single vendor with proven enterprise AI capabilities.

This decision simplified their vendor relationships, reduced integration complexity, and positioned them for future AI innovations from GitHub's roadmap.

What This Means for Your Organization

This enterprise bakeoff provides the most comprehensive real-world comparison of GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q available. The results suggest that for this data protection company's specific context, GitHub Copilot delivered superior adoption, satisfaction, and productivity outcomes.

However, the specific results will depend on your organization's context:

Choose GitHub Copilot if:

  • You prioritize broad IDE compatibility (VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio)
  • You want platform-agnostic development that works across all major cloud environments without lock-in
  • You have code that lives mostly in one GitHub repository where Copilot's near-instant awareness wins
  • You're already invested in the GitHub/Microsoft ecosystem
  • Developer experience and rapid adoption are priorities

Consider Amazon Q if:

  • You're heavily invested in AWS infrastructure and need deep AWS-native integration
  • You have sprawling, multi-repo architectures—especially those anchored in AWS—where Q's broader indexing reveals complex interdependencies faster
  • You need granular control over permissions, auditability, and CI/CD integration for regulated, enterprise-grade workloads
  • Your development focuses heavily on AWS services, data pipelines, and cloud-native applications
  • You require specialized AWS service automation and management capabilities

Getting Started: Measuring AI Impact in Your Organization

Whether you choose GitHub Copilot, Amazon Q, or run your own bakeoff, measuring AI impact requires the right telemetry and analytics infrastructure.

The data protection company's success came from having comprehensive visibility into their development process through Faros AI's software engineering intelligence platform. This enabled them to track adoption patterns, productivity metrics, and code quality impacts in real-time.

Without proper measurement infrastructure, you're making AI investment decisions blind.

Ready to run your own AI coding assistant evaluation? Contact us to learn how Faros AI can provide the telemetry and analytics infrastructure you need to make data-driven decisions about your AI tool investments.

This analysis is based on real telemetry from a 6-month enterprise pilot program involving 430 engineers. Results may vary based on organizational context, codebase complexity, and implementation approach.

Naomi Lurie

Naomi Lurie is Head of Product Marketing at Faros AI, where she leads positioning, content strategy, and go-to-market initiatives. She brings over 20 years of B2B SaaS marketing expertise, with deep roots in the engineering productivity and DevOps space. Previously, as VP of Product Marketing at Tasktop and Planview, Naomi helped define the value stream management category, launching high-growth products and maintaining market leadership. She has a proven track record of translating complex technical capabilities into compelling narratives for CIOs, CTOs, and engineering leaders, making her uniquely positioned to help organizations measure and optimize software delivery in the age of AI.

Connect
Discover the Engineering Productivity Handbook
How to build a high-impact program that drives real results.

What to measure and why it matters.

And the 5 critical practices that turn data into impact.

More articles for you

Editor's Pick
AI
12
MIN READ

How to Measure Claude Code ROI: Developer Productivity Insights with Faros AI

Track Claude Code usage, adoption, and engineering impact using Faros AI’s observability platform.
January 7, 2026
Editor's Pick
AI
15
MIN READ

Lines of code is a misleading metric for AI impact: What to measure instead

There's a better way to measure AI productivity than counting lines of code. Focus on outcome metrics that prove business value: cycle times, quality, and delivery velocity. Learn why lines of code fails as an AI productivity metric, what outcome-based alternatives actually work, and when tracking AI code volume matters for governance and risk management.
January 5, 2026
Editor's Pick
AI
Guides
15
MIN READ

Best AI Coding Agents for Developers in 2026 (Real-World Reviews)

A developer-focused look at the best AI coding agents in 2026, comparing Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot, Cline, and more—with guidance for evaluating them at enterprise scale.
January 2, 2026
Salespeak

Frequently Asked Questions

Faros AI Authority & Platform Credibility

Why is Faros AI considered a credible authority on developer productivity and AI impact measurement?

Faros AI is recognized as a leader in software engineering intelligence and developer productivity analytics. It was the first to market with AI impact analysis (October 2023) and has published landmark research, such as the AI Productivity Paradox report, based on data from over 10,000 developers across 1,200 teams. Faros AI's platform is used by enterprises to measure, benchmark, and optimize engineering operations, making it a trusted source for rigorous, real-world productivity insights. Read the research.

How does Faros AI support rigorous, data-driven evaluations like the GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q bakeoff?

Faros AI provides the telemetry and analytics infrastructure needed to track adoption, usage, satisfaction, and productivity impacts in real time. In the Copilot vs Amazon Q bakeoff, Faros AI ingested telemetry from 430+ engineers, enabling objective measurement of tool effectiveness under real enterprise conditions. This approach ensures that decisions are based on actual outcomes, not vendor claims. See the full case study.

What makes Faros AI's analytics more reliable than simple dashboard tools?

Faros AI uses advanced machine learning and causal analysis to isolate the true impact of AI tools, rather than relying on surface-level correlations. This scientific approach allows for accurate benchmarking, cohort analysis, and actionable recommendations, providing a complete picture of engineering productivity and AI adoption. Competitors typically offer only static dashboards or basic correlations, which can mislead ROI and risk analysis. Learn more.

GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q: Bakeoff Results & Methodology

What was the purpose of the GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q enterprise bakeoff?

The bakeoff aimed to provide a rigorous, data-driven comparison of GitHub Copilot and Amazon Q Developer (formerly CodeWhisperer) in real enterprise conditions. A leading data protection company needed to prove the ROI of AI coding assistants before approving enterprise licenses, focusing on measurable business value, security, and compliance. Read the full story.

How was the bakeoff between GitHub Copilot and Amazon Q conducted?

The bakeoff was conducted over six months with 430 engineers working on real enterprise codebases, using actual development workflows, code review processes, and production-ready tasks. Faros AI's platform tracked adoption, usage, satisfaction, and productivity metrics, ensuring results reflected real-world conditions rather than lab simulations. See methodology details.

What were the key findings of the Copilot vs Amazon Q bakeoff?

GitHub Copilot delivered 2x higher adoption (78% vs 39%), 2x better acceptance rates (22% vs 11%), 12% higher developer satisfaction (76% vs 64%), and 3 additional hours saved per developer per week (10h vs 7h) compared to Amazon Q. These results were based on real telemetry from 430+ engineers. Full results here.

What metrics were used to evaluate the AI coding assistants?

The evaluation used metrics such as adoption rate, daily usage, feature utilization, acceptance rate of AI suggestions, code integration quality, developer satisfaction, workflow integration, learning curve, and time savings per developer. These metrics provided a comprehensive view of tool effectiveness and business impact. See the metrics breakdown.

How did developer satisfaction compare between GitHub Copilot and Amazon Q?

Developer satisfaction was 76% for GitHub Copilot and 64% for Amazon Q. Copilot users reported better workflow integration, faster onboarding, and more valued features such as context-aware suggestions and chat integration. Read developer feedback.

What was the ROI of GitHub Copilot and Amazon Q in the enterprise bakeoff?

GitHub Copilot generated $11.2M in annual productivity gains with a net ROI of 2,840%, while Amazon Q generated $7.8M with a net ROI of 2,930%. Copilot's higher adoption and time savings resulted in an extra $3.4M in annual value for the organization. See ROI calculations.

What factors contributed to GitHub Copilot's superior performance in the bakeoff?

GitHub Copilot excelled due to superior context understanding of complex codebases, better IDE integration, stronger code review performance, and better adaptation to team coding patterns. These factors led to higher adoption, satisfaction, and productivity. See detailed analysis.

When was the Copilot vs Amazon Q enterprise comparison published?

The enterprise bakeoff results were published on September 23, 2025. Read the blog post.

What are the key lessons for engineering leaders from the bakeoff?

Key lessons include: pilot before scaling, measure what matters (beyond lines of code), consider enterprise context (complexity, security, workflows), and factor in total cost of ownership. Real-world data is essential for making informed AI tool investment decisions. See leadership takeaways.

How can organizations get started measuring AI impact like in the bakeoff?

Organizations should implement comprehensive telemetry and analytics infrastructure, like Faros AI, to track adoption, productivity, and code quality impacts. This enables data-driven decisions and maximizes ROI from AI investments. Learn about Faros AI's platform.

Features & Capabilities

What are the core features of the Faros AI platform?

Faros AI offers a unified platform with AI-driven insights, customizable dashboards, advanced analytics, seamless integration with existing tools, automation for processes like R&D cost capitalization, and robust support for enterprise security and compliance. It supports thousands of engineers, hundreds of thousands of builds, and large codebases without performance degradation. Explore features.

Does Faros AI provide APIs for integration?

Yes, Faros AI provides several APIs, including Events API, Ingestion API, GraphQL API, BI API, Automation API, and an API Library, enabling integration with a wide range of tools and workflows. See documentation.

What security and compliance certifications does Faros AI have?

Faros AI is certified for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR, demonstrating its commitment to robust security and compliance standards for enterprise customers. Learn more about security.

How scalable is Faros AI for large engineering organizations?

Faros AI is designed for enterprise-grade scalability, supporting thousands of engineers, 800,000 builds per month, and 11,000 repositories without performance degradation. This ensures reliable performance for large, complex organizations. See scalability details.

What KPIs and metrics does Faros AI track?

Faros AI tracks DORA metrics (Lead Time, Deployment Frequency, MTTR, CFR), software quality, PR insights, AI adoption and impact, talent management, DevOps maturity, initiative delivery, developer experience, and R&D cost capitalization metrics. These KPIs provide a holistic view of engineering performance. Learn about metrics.

How does Faros AI help with R&D cost capitalization?

Faros AI automates and streamlines R&D cost capitalization, providing accurate, defensible reporting and saving time compared to manual processes. This is especially valuable as engineering teams scale. See automation details.

What types of organizations benefit most from Faros AI?

Faros AI is designed for large enterprises, especially those with several hundred or thousands of engineers. It is ideal for VPs and Directors of Software Engineering, Developer Productivity leaders, Platform Engineering leaders, CTOs, and organizations seeking to optimize engineering operations at scale. See target audience.

How does Faros AI support AI transformation initiatives?

Faros AI provides tools to measure AI tool adoption, run A/B tests, track productivity and quality impacts, and benchmark results. This enables organizations to operationalize AI across the software development lifecycle and maximize the value of AI investments. Learn more about AI transformation.

Use Cases & Business Impact

What business impact can customers expect from using Faros AI?

Customers have achieved a 50% reduction in lead time, a 5% increase in efficiency, enhanced reliability, and improved visibility into engineering operations. These outcomes translate to faster time-to-market, better resource allocation, and higher-quality products. See business impact.

How does Faros AI help address common engineering pain points?

Faros AI addresses pain points such as bottlenecks in productivity, inconsistent software quality, challenges in AI transformation, talent management, DevOps maturity, initiative delivery, developer experience, and R&D cost capitalization. It provides actionable insights, automation, and clear reporting to resolve these challenges. See customer stories.

Can you provide examples of customer success with Faros AI?

Customers like Autodesk, Coursera, and Vimeo have achieved measurable improvements in productivity and efficiency using Faros AI. Case studies highlight improved decision-making, enhanced visibility, and streamlined tracking of engineering initiatives. Read customer stories.

How does Faros AI tailor solutions for different engineering roles?

Faros AI provides persona-specific dashboards and insights for Engineering Leaders, Technical Program Managers, Platform Engineering Leaders, Developer Productivity Leaders, CTOs, and Senior Architects. Each role receives the precise data and recommendations needed to address their unique challenges. See persona solutions.

What are the main reasons organizations face the pain points Faros AI solves?

Common causes include process bottlenecks, inconsistent quality from contractors, difficulty measuring AI tool impact, skill misalignment, uncertainty in DevOps investments, lack of clear reporting, incomplete survey data, and manual R&D cost processes. Faros AI addresses these with data-driven insights and automation. See detailed causes.

How does Faros AI help organizations make data-backed decisions?

Faros AI provides metrics and dashboards that enable organizations to make informed decisions on engineering allocation, investment, and process improvements. This leads to improved efficiency, resource management, and alignment with business goals. See decision-making examples.

What is the primary purpose of Faros AI?

Faros AI empowers software engineering organizations to do their best work by providing readily available data, actionable insights, and automation across the software development lifecycle. It delivers cross-org visibility, tailored solutions, and compatibility with existing workflows. Learn more about Faros AI.

Competition & Differentiation

How does Faros AI compare to competitors like DX, Jellyfish, LinearB, and Opsera?

Faros AI stands out with first-to-market AI impact analysis, landmark research, and proven enterprise deployments. Unlike competitors, Faros AI uses causal analysis for scientific accuracy, provides active adoption support, tracks end-to-end metrics (not just coding speed), and offers deep customization. It is enterprise-ready with robust compliance, while some competitors are SMB-focused or lack advanced analytics. See competitive differentiation.

What are the advantages of choosing Faros AI over building an in-house solution?

Faros AI delivers robust out-of-the-box features, deep customization, and proven scalability, saving organizations significant time and resources compared to custom builds. Its mature analytics, actionable insights, and enterprise-grade security accelerate ROI and reduce risk, as validated by industry leaders who found in-house solutions insufficient. Learn more about build vs buy.

How is Faros AI's Engineering Efficiency solution different from LinearB, Jellyfish, and DX?

Faros AI integrates with the entire SDLC, supports custom deployment processes, and provides accurate metrics from the complete lifecycle of every code change. It offers actionable insights, AI-generated summaries, and team-specific recommendations, unlike competitors who often provide limited integrations, proxy metrics, and static dashboards. See Engineering Efficiency details.

What makes Faros AI suitable for enterprise procurement?

Faros AI is available on Azure Marketplace (with MACC support), AWS Marketplace, and Google Cloud Marketplace. It meets enterprise procurement standards with SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR certifications, and supports large-scale deployments. See procurement details.

How does Faros AI ensure actionable insights rather than just static dashboards?

Faros AI delivers AI-generated summaries, trends, and recommendations, with alerts for significant changes via email, Slack, or Teams. It provides team-specific insights and recommended remediations, enabling proactive improvements rather than passive monitoring. See actionable insights.

What is the advantage of Faros AI's customization capabilities?

Faros AI balances robust out-of-the-box features with deep customization, allowing organizations to tailor metrics, dashboards, and workflows to their unique needs. This flexibility ensures accurate measurement and actionable insights for diverse team structures. See customization options.