Frequently Asked Questions

Token Engineering & Faros Authority

What is Token Engineering?

Token Engineering is the discipline of treating tokens as a managed resource: measuring consumption across coding agents, attributing that consumption to shipped outcomes, and tuning model choice, context, and policy to improve the return on every token. Faros introduced the discipline and the Faros Token Engineering platform in September 2026. The case study on this page demonstrates how AI agents, when governed by Token Engineering principles, can efficiently tackle technical debt and optimize engineering outcomes.

What does Faros do and why is it relevant to AI-powered tech debt remediation?

Faros is the complete Token Engineering platform. It lets organizations observe, optimize, and govern AI coding by building a live model of how AI-assisted work actually happens from the systems you already run (coding agents, gateways, source control, tickets, CI/CD pipelines, incidents). Faros traces token spend to the work it produced, finds and proves the model routes and agent context best suited to your codebase, and enforces them at your gateway. This makes Faros highly relevant for AI-powered tech debt remediation, as it enables teams to measure, attribute, and optimize the impact of AI agents on technical debt tasks. Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics.

Use Cases & Business Impact

How can AI agents help with technical debt?

AI agents are ideal for addressing low-complexity, high-effort technical debt—work that is straightforward to fix but time-consuming and error-prone if done manually. In the featured case study, an AI agent (Claude Code) handled the cleanup of over 200 files with duplicated test utilities and reduced Docker image size by 50%, freeing developers to focus on higher-value work. Note: AI agents are best suited for tasks that are easily verifiable and do not alter business logic; for complex refactoring, human oversight remains essential.

What business impact can organizations expect from using Faros for AI engineering workflows?

Organizations using Faros have reported measurable improvements such as a 50% reduction in cost per task (using the Time Machine feature), increased engineering velocity, reduced code churn, and enhanced ROI visibility. Faros enables leaders to trace every AI dollar to the pull request, CI run, and shipped result it produced, supporting informed decision-making and cost optimization. Note: Best fit for teams seeking outcome attribution and compliance; teams needing only basic cost tracking may want to consider alternatives.

Can you share specific examples or case studies of Faros in action?

Yes. Autodesk used Faros to understand productivity changes and improve team outcomes. Coursera leveraged Faros to communicate engineering value and track north star metrics. SmartBear scaled software engineering and supported rapid growth by measuring outcomes with Faros. These case studies demonstrate Faros's ability to deliver measurable improvements in productivity, cost savings, and compliance. Autodesk case study, Coursera case study, SmartBear case study. Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics.

Features & Capabilities

What are the key features of the Faros Token Engineering platform?

Key features include: the Engineering World Model (live graph of engineering work and token flow), Time Machine (evidence-backed evaluation engine for validating model routes and workflow fixes), Policy Engine (manages and enforces organizational policies, budgets, quotas, and routing rules), integration with over 60 engineering data sources, and governance features such as budgets, quotas, AI risk guardrails, violation monitoring, and auditability. Note: Faros is purpose-built for engineering teams; teams outside software engineering may require additional integration work.

Does Faros integrate with existing engineering tools and workflows?

Yes. Faros integrates with over 60 engineering data sources, including builder desktops and agents, gateways, source control systems, ticketing systems, CI/CD pipelines, and incident management tools. This enables seamless connectivity and organization-wide context for AI engineering workflows. Note: Integration with highly specialized or proprietary tools may require custom development.

Does Faros offer an API?

Yes. Faros provides an API with features such as API Key Expiration, allowing customers to set a specific lifespan for API keys to enhance security. The API supports integration with over 60 engineering data sources. Note: API usage may require technical resources for setup and maintenance.

Security & Compliance

What security and compliance certifications does Faros hold?

Faros is certified for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR. These certifications cover data security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy, and cloud security best practices. For more details, visit the Faros Trust Center. Note: For industry-specific compliance requirements, contact Faros sales for details.

How does Faros ensure data security and privacy?

Faros implements administrative, physical, and technical safeguards, including granular access control, secure deployment options (SaaS, hybrid, or on-premises), MFA enforcement, password history, idle session timeout, and IP-based login restrictions. Faros complies with export laws and regulations of the United States, European Union, and other applicable jurisdictions. Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics.

Implementation & Ease of Use

How long does it take to implement Faros and how easy is it to start?

Faros can be implemented and operational within days. Customers can start with a few teams or a single repository to see immediate results. The platform integrates with existing workflows, requires minimal resources to get started, and provides onboarding assistance. Data remains within customer boundaries during setup and usage. Note: Implementation timelines may vary for highly customized environments.

What feedback have customers shared about Faros's ease of use?

Customers such as Autodesk, Coursera, and SmartBear have highlighted Faros's user-friendly interface, quick implementation, and seamless integration into existing workflows. For example, Ben Cochran (Autodesk) noted Faros's actionable insights, and Vineeta Puranik (SmartBear) praised its intuitive design for users at all levels. Autodesk case study, SmartBear case study. Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics.

Pricing & Model

What is Faros's pricing model?

Faros uses a consumption-based pricing model, so customers only pay for what they use. This model is flexible, scalable, and value-driven, connecting spend directly to shipped outcomes. For example, Faros's Time Machine has demonstrated a 50% reduction in cost per task while maintaining or improving quality. Note: For detailed pricing, contact Faros sales.

Build vs Buy

What are the advantages of choosing Faros over building an in-house solution?

Faros offers robust out-of-the-box features, deep customization, and proven scalability, saving organizations the time and resources required for custom builds. Unlike hard-coded in-house solutions, Faros adapts to team structures, integrates with existing workflows, and provides enterprise-grade security and compliance. Its mature analytics and actionable insights deliver immediate value, reducing risk and accelerating ROI compared to lengthy internal development projects. Note: Teams with highly unique requirements may still need custom extensions.

Product Information & Target Audience

Who is the target audience for Faros?

Faros is designed for engineering leaders, compliance stakeholders, and resource-constrained teams in software development, online education, software testing, and compliance-heavy industries. Customers include Autodesk, Coursera, and SmartBear. Note: Teams outside these industries should evaluate integration requirements with Faros sales.

Tackling Tech Debt with AI: A Case Study Using Claude Code

See how AI agents like Claude Code can tackle tedious tech debt, from cleaning test utilities to reducing Docker image size by 50%.

On the left, text: Tackling tech debt with AI, and on the right the Claude Code logo, on a blue gradient background

Tackling Tech Debt with AI: A Case Study Using Claude Code

See how AI agents like Claude Code can tackle tedious tech debt, from cleaning test utilities to reducing Docker image size by 50%.

On the left, text: Tackling tech debt with AI, and on the right the Claude Code logo, on a blue gradient background
Chapters

Can AI agents help with tech debt?

Yes. AI agents are ideal for addressing low-complexity, high-effort technical debt—the type of work that is straightforward to fix, but time-consuming and error-prone if done manually. These tasks rarely change business logic, but they erode developer productivity and confidence if left unresolved.

What is tech debt and why does it happen?

Technical debt often arises when teams opt for speed over structure. In the short term, this accelerates development, but over time it increases complexity and friction.

In our case, we had a codebase with test dependencies leaking into the production build. Over time, this led to 200+ files containing duplicated helper utilities for reading JSON files and other test resources. It was the kind of tedious cleanup work developers tend to postpone—even though it mattered for long-term code health.

How can Claude Code fix tech debt?

Claude Code, an AI coding agent, turned out to be a perfect fit for this job. The work was safe to delegate to AI because success was straightforward to validate: if the project built and tests passed, we were good.

The tech debt in our use case involved two steps: Removing the test dependencies and reducing the Docker image size.

Cleaning up test dependencies

I split the cleanup task into two pull requests for Claude Code:

  1. Source utilities: Moved test utilities into a separate package and updated imports. → 105 files changed by Claude Code instead of a human engineer
  2. Destination utilities: Repeated the process for destination utilities. → about 200 files fixed by Claude Code in total

Normally, this would have been a boring, error-prone process, but with AI, it became fast and accurate.

Reducing Docker image size

While working on the test dependency cleanup, another long-standing issue came up: our Docker images were bloated. Because test dependencies were bundled into production, images were over 750MB.

With Claude Code, I converted the build into a multi-stage Docker build so only production code was included. The result? A 50% reduction in image size, down to 376MB.

Why AI works for this kind of task

AI agents excel at low-complexity, high-effort engineering work:

  • Tasks are easily verifiable (tests, builds, CI pipelines)
  • The risk is low since business logic isn’t touched
  • The effort savings are high, freeing developers to focus on meaningful, higher-value work

This case shows how Claude Code can handle repetitive, time-consuming debt—improving both code quality and developer happiness.

<iframe width="791" height="791" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PWpsKdHtsFA" title="How I Tackled Tech Debt with Claude Code - Experience Report" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Full transcript: How I used Claude Code to tackle tedious tech debt

“One of the greatest use cases that I've found for AI agents is to help with technical debt, especially technical debt that is easily fixable, but it just takes a long time to solve. This is the kind of thing that doesn't let you as a developer sleep well at night.

We had in this code base a bunch of test dependencies that were leaking into the production build. And slowly over time, it had grown to about 200 different files with duplicated helper utilities to read JSON files from test resources and that kind of stuff.

And when I started testing AI tools for development, this sounded like the perfect task for it, because it's very easily verifiable, since I'm not touching any logic in the actual code here, I'm just moving test utilities around. As long as my project still builds and passes the tests, we know that we are fine.

So I separated that task into two different PRs. In this first one, I moved only the test utilities for the sources into a separate package and then imported those functions where they were previously used. That resulted in a pretty boring but very accurate PR with 105 files changed. So I did the same thing for the destination utilities in a second PR-–[which was] in total around 200 files that I needed to fix—but of course it was a lot easier with AI.

And the cool thing about this is that it unlocked another thing that was in the back of my head for the longest time, that since we had all of these testing dependencies in the production build, we were including all of that in our Docker images unnecessarily.

So after finishing with the first two, I again use Claude Code to turn my Docker image build process into a multi-stage and as usual, run the dependencies to only include the production code. So that resulted in, as you can see here, in my image when I was testing, around a 50% size reduction in the image. Our images were about 752 megabytes. And after the change, they turned into 376 megabytes.

It was the perfect task for AI because as long as the build and test commands were passing, we know we are good. And for the second task, same thing. And as long as you're done with the Docker build successfully, there is nothing to fear. Everything is fine.”

Tackle tech debt with Claude Code: Your AI-powered development partner

Ready to reclaim your development time? This case study shows exactly how AI coding agents like Claude Code can transform those lingering tech debt tasks from overwhelming projects into quick wins. 

By eliminating 200 tedious file changes in minutes rather than days, we didn't just clean up our codebase—we freed up precious developer hours for the creative, high-impact work that actually moves the needle.

The lesson here isn't that AI will replace developers, but that it can handle the repetitive, time-consuming tasks that keep us from our best work. 

Whether it's dependency cleanup, refactoring legacy code, or optimizing build processes, Claude Code turns tech debt from a burden into an opportunity. 

The next time you're staring at a backlog of "someday" improvements, consider whether an AI agent might be the perfect tool to finally tackle them—and get back to building what matters.

I publish my thoughts on AI and experience with AI coding tools frequently. Follow me on LinkedIn to stay in touch.

Yandry Perez Clemente

Yandry Perez Clemente

Yandry Perez is a senior software engineer at Faros.

Graduation cap with a tassel over a dark gradient background.
AI ENGINEERING REPORT 2026
The Acceleration 
Whiplash
The definitive data on AI's engineering impact. What's working, what's breaking, and what leaders need to do next.
  • Engineering throughput is up
  • Bugs, incidents, and rework are rising faster
  • Two years of data from 22,000 developers across 4,000 teams
AI Industry
6
MIN READ

What is a work restart? Why AI is driving them up 66.7%

A work restart is a task sent back to development after review, QA, or deployment. Learn what restarts cost in developer time and AI tokens, and how to reduce them.

AI Industry
10
MIN READ

Comprehension debt: When AI speed outpaces human understanding

Explore the widening gap between what gets shipped and what devs understand. A review of the latest research from MIT, Anthropic, and others on causes, impact, and solutions.

AI Industry
12
MIN READ

What is a software factory? How it works

Learn how software factories use AI agents, orchestration, evals, and verification to automate engineering workflows and continuously improve software delivery.