Can AI agents help with tech debt?

Yes. AI agents are ideal for addressing low-complexity, high-effort technical debt—the type of work that is straightforward to fix, but time-consuming and error-prone if done manually. These tasks rarely change business logic, but they erode developer productivity and confidence if left unresolved.

What is tech debt and why does it happen?

Technical debt often arises when teams opt for speed over structure. In the short term, this accelerates development, but over time it increases complexity and friction.

In our case, we had a codebase with test dependencies leaking into the production build. Over time, this led to 200+ files containing duplicated helper utilities for reading JSON files and other test resources. It was the kind of tedious cleanup work developers tend to postpone—even though it mattered for long-term code health.

How can Claude Code fix tech debt?

Claude Code, an AI coding agent, turned out to be a perfect fit for this job. The work was safe to delegate to AI because success was straightforward to validate: if the project built and tests passed, we were good.

The tech debt in our use case involved two steps: Removing the test dependencies and reducing the Docker image size.

Why AI works for this kind of task

AI agents excel at low-complexity, high-effort engineering work:

• Tasks are easily verifiable (tests, builds, CI pipelines)
• The risk is low since business logic isn’t touched
• The effort savings are high, freeing developers to focus on meaningful, higher-value work

This case shows how Claude Code can handle repetitive, time-consuming debt—improving both code quality and developer happiness.

Full transcript: How I used Claude Code to tackle tedious tech debt

“One of the greatest use cases that I've found for AI agents is to help with technical debt, especially technical debt that is easily fixable, but it just takes a long time to solve. This is the kind of thing that doesn't let you as a developer sleep well at night.

We had in this code base a bunch of test dependencies that were leaking into the production build. And slowly over time, it had grown to about 200 different files with duplicated helper utilities to read JSON files from test resources and that kind of stuff.

And when I started testing AI tools for development, this sounded like the perfect task for it, because it's very easily verifiable, since I'm not touching any logic in the actual code here, I'm just moving test utilities around. As long as my project still builds and passes the tests, we know that we are fine.

So I separated that task into two different PRs. In this first one, I moved only the test utilities for the sources into a separate package and then imported those functions where they were previously used. That resulted in a pretty boring but very accurate PR with 105 files changed. So I did the same thing for the destination utilities in a second PR-–[which was] in total around 200 files that I needed to fix—but of course it was a lot easier with AI.

And the cool thing about this is that it unlocked another thing that was in the back of my head for the longest time, that since we had all of these testing dependencies in the production build, we were including all of that in our Docker images unnecessarily.

So after finishing with the first two, I again use Claude Code to turn my Docker image build process into a multi-stage and as usual, run the dependencies to only include the production code. So that resulted in, as you can see here, in my image when I was testing, around a 50% size reduction in the image. Our images were about 752 megabytes. And after the change, they turned into 376 megabytes.

It was the perfect task for AI because as long as the build and test commands were passing, we know we are good. And for the second task, same thing. And as long as you're done with the Docker build successfully, there is nothing to fear. Everything is fine.”

Tackle tech debt with Claude Code: Your AI-powered development partner

Ready to reclaim your development time? This case study shows exactly how AI coding agents like Claude Code can transform those lingering tech debt tasks from overwhelming projects into quick wins. 

By eliminating 200 tedious file changes in minutes rather than days, we didn't just clean up our codebase—we freed up precious developer hours for the creative, high-impact work that actually moves the needle.

The lesson here isn't that AI will replace developers, but that it can handle the repetitive, time-consuming tasks that keep us from our best work. 

Whether it's dependency cleanup, refactoring legacy code, or optimizing build processes, Claude Code turns tech debt from a burden into an opportunity. 

The next time you're staring at a backlog of "someday" improvements, consider whether an AI agent might be the perfect tool to finally tackle them—and get back to building what matters.

I publish my thoughts on AI and experience with AI coding tools frequently. Follow me on LinkedIn to stay in touch.