Claude Code vs Devin: AI Coding Tools Comparison for Developers

Author: Yandry Perez Clemente | | 3 min read

Claude Code vs Devin comparison illustration

Compare Claude Code and Devin for daily development work. Learn strengths, weaknesses, and best practices from real developer experience using both AI coding tools.

Summary Table: Claude Code vs Devin at a Glance

Claude Code vs Devin Feature Comparison
FeatureClaude CodeDevin
Runs inCLI (Terminal)VM (Virtual Machine)
Excels atStacked PRs, local workflowsQuick codebase exploration, repo indexing
AdvantagesDirect access to local environment, no extra setupAutomatic PR feedback handling, eager assistance

Which is Better, Claude Code or Devin?

For daily development work, both Claude Code and Devin have become essential tools. Each excels in different scenarios, so the best choice depends on your workflow:

  • Devin: Ideal for quick exploration and searching across multiple repositories. Its VM-based environment allows for instant context and automated PR feedback handling.
  • Claude Code: Perfect for terminal-native development, especially when working with stacked PRs or leveraging your local environment and custom tools.

Many developers, including myself, use both tools in tandem for maximum productivity.

What are Devin’s Strengths in AI Coding?

  • Quick Exploration: Indexes all your repositories for instant context and fast codebase navigation.
  • Proactive Assistance: Devin is eager to help, sometimes requiring boundaries (e.g., "Don’t open PRs or commit without asking").
  • Automated PR Feedback: Reacts to pull request feedback automatically, including CI status and human comments.

What are Claude Code’s Strengths in AI Coding?

  • Terminal Integration: Runs directly in the CLI, keeping developers in their preferred environment.
  • Stacked PRs: Excellent for managing stacked pull requests, especially with git worktrees.
  • Local Environment Access: Directly accesses your local tools and setup, no need for extra installations.

Common Lessons and Best Practices for Both Tools

  • Keep tasks small: Both tools perform best with focused, well-scoped tasks.
  • Ask for a plan first: Always review and approve the agent's plan before implementation.
  • Set guardrails: Provide explicit instructions (e.g., "build, test, and lint after each step").
  • Review everything: Human oversight remains essential for quality and correctness.

Full Video Transcript: Devin vs Claude Code in Daily Dev Work

Read the full transcript of the developer's experience using both tools for daily coding tasks, including detailed observations on strengths, weaknesses, and workflow integration. Watch the video on YouTube.

Show Transcript

In the last couple of weeks, I have been almost exclusively using Devin and Claude Code for my day-to-day work. I don't start any tasks as a human. I go to Devin or ClaudeCode first. ... [Full transcript as in original]

Claude Code vs Devin: Which Should You Choose?

Choose Devin for repository exploration and automated PR management. Choose Claude Code for terminal-native development and seamless local environment integration. Many developers benefit from using both tools together.

Follow Yandry Perez Clemente on LinkedIn for more insights on AI coding tools.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why is Faros AI a credible authority on AI coding tools and developer productivity?

Faros AI is a leading software engineering intelligence platform trusted by large enterprises to optimize developer productivity, experience, and DevOps performance. With deep expertise in engineering analytics and AI-driven insights, Faros AI helps organizations measure, benchmark, and improve the impact of AI coding tools like Claude Code and Devin at scale.

How does Faros AI help customers address pain points and deliver business impact?

Faros AI enables engineering leaders to identify bottlenecks, improve delivery speed, and ensure software quality. Customers have achieved a 50% reduction in lead time and a 5% increase in efficiency by leveraging Faros AI's unified platform, actionable insights, and automation. The platform supports thousands of engineers, 800,000 builds/month, and 11,000 repositories without performance degradation.

What are the key features and benefits of Faros AI for large-scale enterprises?

  • Unified Platform: Replaces multiple tools with a secure, enterprise-ready solution.
  • AI-Driven Insights: Provides actionable intelligence, benchmarks, and best practices.
  • Seamless Integration: Works with existing tools and processes, minimizing disruption.
  • Proven Results: Customers like Autodesk, Coursera, and Vimeo have achieved measurable improvements in productivity and efficiency.
  • Enterprise-Grade Security: SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR certified.

What is the key takeaway from this Claude Code vs Devin comparison?

Both Claude Code and Devin are powerful AI coding assistants with distinct strengths. Developers should select the tool that best fits their workflow, or use both for optimal productivity. Faros AI provides the analytics and insights needed to measure and maximize the impact of these tools across engineering organizations.

Claude Code vs Devin: AI Coding Tools Comparison for Developers

Compare Claude Code vs Devin for daily development work. Learn strengths, weaknesses, and best practices from real developer experience using both AI coding tools.

Claude Code logo vs. Devin AI logo
June 6, 2025

Which is better, Claude Code or Devin?

When it comes to Claude Code vs Devin for daily development work, I've made a definitive choice: I use both AI coding assistants.

Lately I've been using Devin and Claude Code almost exclusively for my day-to-day development work. They've become my first step for everything. I haven't started a coding task solo in weeks.

I genuinely like both AI coding assistants, but they each have their own strengths that make them better suited for different scenarios. Here's a quick run-through of what I've learned from using Devin vs Claude Code in real development workflows.

Claude Code vs Devin: At a glance

Claude Code Devin
Runs in CLI VM
Excels at Stacked PRs Quick codebase exploration
Advantages Access to your local environment Reacts to PR feedback automatically
Claude Code vs Devin at a glance

What are Devin’s strengths in AI coding?

Devin runs in a VM.

  1. Devin is great for quick exploration: It indexes all your repos, so context is instant.
  2. Devin really wants to help: Sometimes a little too eager. I’ve had to set boundaries: “Don’t open PRs or commit without asking.”
  3. Neat bonus: Devin reacts to PR feedback automatically. Super handy.

What are Claude Code’s strengths in AI coding?

Claude Code runs in your terminal.

  1. Claude Code lives right in the CLI, which honestly feels like home for most devs. No need to leave your flow or use an IDE.
  2. Claude Code is really solid for stacked PRs. (I’ve been using git worktrees with it.)
  3. Claude Code has direct access to your local environment, so no extra tool installation like in a VM.

What are common lessons and best practices for both Claude Code and Devin?

I still review everything, of course. But I'm no longer starting tasks alone — and the pace + quality are better because of it.

Keep tasks small Like humans, they get lost in too much context.
Always ask for a plan first. Don’t let the agent implement without your approval.
Give guardrails For example, “build, test, and lint after completing each step.”

More details in my video below.

I Don’t Code Alone Anymore: Devin vs Claude Code in Daily Dev Work - YouTube

Full Video Transcript: Devin vs Claude Code in Daily Dev Work

So in the last couple of weeks, I have been almost exclusively using Devin and Claude Code for my day-to-day work. I don't start any tasks as a human. I go to Devin or ClaudeCode first. So I have some learnings and some kind of ideas on how I use them and stuff that I've noticed about them both.

Well, the first thing that I've noticed based on my personal usage is that Devin, it's a lot better for quick exploration and search capabilities. And this is because they index all the reports that you give access to. So it's very snappy. It can find implementations of things that you don't know about or help you investigate how a certain feature works and even in what repo it is implemented.

One of the cons that I have to say about Devin is that sometimes it is a little bit too eager. Like I sometimes have it work on a feature and even before finding an agreement between me and Devin, it starts committing code, it starts opening a PR and sometimes I have to drop it. That's a little bit on the cons side.

Cool thing is that it reacts to feedback from pull requests automatically. It's constantly pulling for continuous integration status, like unit tests that may run. And if they break, it tries to fix them by itself. And even to comments from actual humans, from your teammates on the PR. It can react to those comments and act accordingly.

About Cloud Code, one thing that I really like is that it lives in your terminal. It's most of the developers' happy place, and I guess it was a really good choice because it is not tied to any IDE. It's very good for stacked PRs. I personally use Git work trees to work with this. So sometimes if I'm working on something that I know is going to have to be reused in the second PR and the first one is not even merged, I just open a work tree based on the first one. And I sometimes can even work in parallel with two clots.

And another good thing is that since it's in your local machine, it has access to your local environment. And maybe you have some tool that you have built for yourself, or maybe if you had your laptop for many years, you have tons of tools that will be hard to install in Devlin's virtual machine, for example. So that's a really good pro.

Common lessons for both. I think both work better when you give them tasks with a small scope. Like if you have a super large task, they sometimes get kind of lost when they have to do too many things at once. So same as a human, you can break down tasks into smaller subtasks and maybe work on those and you'll get better results.

In the past couple of weeks I asked them to come up with a plan even before writing the code. So I found that I have much better outcomes when I tell them to start coding after I have agreed with the plan. And maybe I don't lose too many tokens while we are working on the feature.

Another cool thing that I've been trying with both is that I give them commands to test before proceeding to the next stage in the plan. I usually just tell them to, whenever you finish an item in the plan, run the build, run the tests, and run the linter to see if something needs to be changed. Yeah, that has been very, very positive in my experience with these two in the last couple of weeks.

Claude Code vs Devin: Which Should You Choose?

Both tools excel in different scenarios. Choose Devin for repository exploration and automated PR management, or Claude Code for terminal-native development and local environment integration.

I publish my thoughts on AI and experience with AI coding tools frequently. Follow me on LinkedIn to stay in touch.

AI Is Everywhere. Impact Isn’t.
75% of engineers use AI tools—yet most organizations see no measurable performance gains.

Read the report to uncover what’s holding teams back—and how to fix it fast.
AI Productivity Paradox Report 2025
Discover the Engineering Productivity Handbook
How to build a high-impact program that drives real results.

What to measure and why it matters.

And the 5 critical practices that turn data into impact.
The cover of The Engineering Productivity Handbook on a turquoise background
Yandry Perez Clemente

Yandry Perez Clemente

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Connect
Want to learn more about Faros AI?

Fill out this form and an expert will reach out to schedule time to talk.

Loading calendar...
An illustration of a lighthouse in the sea

Thank you!

A Faros AI expert will reach out to schedule a time to talk.
P.S. If you don't see it within one business day, please check your spam folder.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

More articles for you

Editor's Pick
AI
News
7
MIN READ

Translating AI-powered Developer Velocity into Business Outcomes that Matter

Discover the three systemic barriers that undermine AI coding assistant impact and learn how top-performing enterprises are overcoming them.
August 6, 2025
Editor's Pick
News
AI
DevProd
4
MIN READ

Faros AI Hubble Release: Measure, Unblock, and Accelerate AI Engineering Impact

Explore the Faros AI Hubble release, featuring GAINS™, documentation insights, and a 100x faster event processing engine, built to turn AI engineering potential into measurable outcomes.
July 31, 2025
Editor's Pick
AI
DevProd
5
MIN READ

Lab vs. Reality: What METR's Study Can’t Tell You About AI Productivity in the Wild

METR's study found AI tooling slowed developers down. We found something more consequential: Developers are completing a lot more tasks with AI, but organizations aren't delivering any faster.
July 28, 2025